Free AI citation grader
Paste any section of your brand copy and this tool scores how structurally ready it is to be cited by generative answer engines. It checks entity anchor density, verifiable claim frequency, opening-section structure, content block integrity, and semantic friction against hard benchmarks for your industry.
Loading grader
Most website copy is written for human readers and optimized for keyword rankings. Neither of those goals prepares your content for the way AI answer engines actually work. Perplexity, Gemini, and SearchGPT do not rank pages by keyword frequency. They extract short blocks of text, score those blocks mathematically, and cite the ones with the highest structural density of named entities and verifiable facts.
This free grader applies five checks to your pasted text. First, it counts your entity anchor density: how many proper nouns, named tools, geographic areas, certifications, and methodologies appear per 100 words, and whether that number meets the benchmark for your industry. Second, it checks your verifiable claim ratio: the proportion of concrete data points (dollar figures, percentages, timelines, counts) relative to your total word count. Third, it runs a BLUF check on the first 20% of your text to confirm your brand name and primary service topic appear together early. Fourth, it slices your content into 150-word vector chunks and flags any that contain claims but no entity anchor, because those blocks get dropped by retrieval pipelines when extracted out of context. Fifth, it scores semantic friction: the number of vague marketing phrases that carry no weight in citation algorithms.
The score runs from 10 to 98, not 0 to 100. A perfect AI citation profile does not exist for real-world business copy, and a score of 10 means the text has essentially no structural retrievability. Scores above 66 indicate content a retrieval engine can confidently cite. Scores above 81 indicate copy engineered close to the theoretical maximum for citation probability.
Use this before you publish a new service page, rewrite your homepage, or ask us to refactor your copy for AEO. It runs entirely in your browser, produces a printable report, and requires no account.
We built this for marketing leads, content strategists, and founders who need to know whether their brand copy is actually structured for AI answer engines, not just written well. If you manage a service page, a company bio, a case study library, or a product description set and you are not sure whether any of it gets cited by Perplexity, Gemini, or SearchGPT, start here. It takes two minutes, needs no account, and gives you a score you can act on the same day.
Straight answers about entity density, RAG pipelines, BLUF structure, and what actually makes brand copy citable by AI answer engines.
This grader evaluates whether your brand copy is structured for extraction by generative answer engines. It runs five deterministic checks: entity anchor density, verifiable claim frequency, opening-section brand presence, content block integrity, and semantic friction. The output is a structural score tied to hard benchmarks for your industry.
Asking ChatGPT or Claude whether your content is AI-ready gives you a writing critique, not an engineering audit. These tools are trained to be agreeable and helpful. They will tell you your copy is clear and well-structured without ever checking whether a retrieval pipeline can actually extract it as a citation.
Perplexity, SearchGPT, and Gemini do not read your page from top to bottom the way a person does. They use Retrieval-Augmented Generation: your page gets sliced into roughly 150-word blocks, each block gets embedded as a mathematical vector, and those vectors are ranked by how closely they match the user's query. If your brand name and service topic do not appear together in enough of those blocks, your content ranks too low to be cited.
This grader runs the same mathematical checks that real retrieval pipelines apply. It counts the density of proper noun anchors your content establishes, checks whether your brand name and core service topic appear in the first fifth of the text, identifies which content blocks are missing entity anchors, and scores the result against hard-coded benchmarks for your industry. The output is a structural engineering report, not a writing opinion.
We built this for marketing leads, content strategists, and founders who need to know whether their brand copy is actually structured for AI answer engines, not just written well. If you manage a service page, a company bio, a case study library, or a product description set and you are not sure whether any of it gets cited by Perplexity, Gemini, or SearchGPT, start here. It takes two minutes, needs no account, and gives you a score you can act on the same day.
Entity anchor density: the ratio of proper nouns, named entities, brand mentions, and industry terms to total word count, compared against industry benchmarks ranging from 6.0% for home services to 8.5% for B2B software. Verifiable claim ratio: the proportion of concrete data points including dollar figures, percentages, timelines, and client counts, benchmarked from 15% to 22% depending on industry. BLUF proximity: whether the brand name and core service topic appear within a 30-word window in the first 20% of the text. Vector chunk integrity: whether all 150-word content blocks contain at least one entity anchor. Semantic friction: the count of vague marketing phrases that AI citation engines deprioritize.
Brevard SEM provides AEO (Answer Engine Optimization), GEO (Generative Engine Optimization), and brand copy engineering for businesses that need to appear in AI-generated answers. Services include entity-structured content writing, schema markup, and citation architecture. Visit brevardsem.com/answer-engine-optimization for AEO services or contact Brevard SEM at brevardsem.com for a strategy session.